Research Project Rubric
Rubric
| Excellent | 5 points |
| Clear, focused objectives well-aligned with the research topic. |
|
| Good | 4 points |
| Clear objectives, mostly aligned with the research topic. |
|
| Satisfactory | 3 points |
| Objectives somewhat clear but lack focus. |
|
| Needs Improvement | 2 points |
| Objectives unclear or poorly aligned with the research topic. |
|
| Unsatisfactory | 1 point |
| Objectives missing or completely irrelevant. |
|
| Weight | 20% |
| Excellent | 5 points |
| Thoroughly explains the research's importance, potential impact, and how it advances the field. |
|
| Good | 4 points |
| Explains research importance and potential impact, though missing some nuances. |
|
| Satisfactory | 3 points |
| Provides basic justification for the research's significance. |
|
| Needs Improvement | 2 points |
| Minimal explanation of significance; lacks compelling rationale. |
|
| Unsatisfactory | 1 point |
| No explanation of the research's importance or impact. |
|
| Weight | 15% |
| Excellent | 5 points |
| Presents a well-detailed and realistic plan with achievable goals, timeline, and methodology. |
|
| Good | 4 points |
| Presents a realistic plan with minor gaps in details, timeline, or methodology. |
|
| Satisfactory | 3 points |
| Plan presented, but lacks some details or realistic expectations. |
|
| Needs Improvement | 2 points |
| Plan is vague, unrealistic, or lacks clear methodology or timeline. |
|
| Unsatisfactory | 1 point |
| No clear plan or unrealistic/unachievable goals. |
|
| Weight | 20% |
| Excellent | 5 points |
| Comprehensive and well-documented budget, fully justified for research activities. |
|
| Good | 4 points |
| Detailed budget, mostly justified, but with minor gaps. |
|
| Satisfactory | 3 points |
| Basic budget provided, but some expenses are not fully justified. |
|
| Needs Improvement | 2 points |
| Budget presented but lacks justification or contains major gaps. |
|
| Unsatisfactory | 1 point |
| No clear budget or unjustified expenses. |
|
| Weight | 15% |
| Excellent | 5 points |
| Responds confidently and thoroughly to all questions, demonstrating deep knowledge of the subject. |
|
| Good | 4 points |
| Responds well to most questions, demonstrating solid understanding. |
|
| Satisfactory | 3 points |
| Able to answer basic questions but struggles with more complex ones. |
|
| Needs Improvement | 2 points |
| Responses to questions are vague or unclear, showing limited understanding. |
|
| Unsatisfactory | 1 point |
| Fails to answer questions or provides irrelevant/inaccurate responses. |
|
| Weight | 10% |
| Excellent | 5 points |
| Demonstrates high innovation, offering creative solutions or a novel approach to the research problem. |
|
| Good | 4 points |
| Displays some innovation with a thoughtful approach to the research problem. |
|
| Satisfactory | 3 points |
| Approach shows some originality but lacks creativity in solving the research problem. |
|
| Needs Improvement | 2 points |
| Minimal innovation; follows conventional approaches without introducing new ideas or solutions. |
|
| Unsatisfactory | 1 point |
| Lacks innovation; no new ideas or original solutions presented. |
|
| Weight | 10% |
| Excellent | 5 points |
| Exceptionally persuasive; the proposal leaves the audience confident in the project's success and value. |
|
| Good | 4 points |
| Persuasive, leaving the audience with a strong impression of the project’s potential. |
|
| Satisfactory | 3 points |
| Proposal is somewhat persuasive but does not fully convince the audience of the project's value or success. |
|
| Needs Improvement | 2 points |
| Proposal is weak, and audience is left with doubts about the project's potential. |
|
| Unsatisfactory | 1 point |
| Fails to persuade the audience; proposal raises serious concerns about the project's potential or value. |
|
| Weight | 10% |
.
Last Modified: 1/30/25 9:47 PM | Website Feedback